Archive for the ‘Energy’ Category

Why installing solar power looks increasingly attractive for homeowners

Tuesday, July 26th, 2011

Falling costs plus generous feed-in tariffs mean return is higher than ever – but payback will fall in April

Are you a homeowner with some spare cash? A 20%-25% collapse in the price of rooftop solar power units in recent months has turned the government’s feed-in tariff scheme into one of the most lucrative financial propositions for households with the right sort of property.

The scheme was introduced in April 2010, when the Labour government introduced generous feed-in tariffs to encourage households to install solar photovoltaic systems. Back then, anyone spending, say, £13,000 up front to fit a 2.5kWp system to their home was paid 41.3p per kilowatt hour (kWh) generated – enough to earn them a typical annual income of £900 a year in payments, on top of a £140-a-year saving in reduced electricity bills.

It was described as a good investment because payments for each unit of electricity generated were guaranteed for 25 years, paid tax-free, and set to rise each year in line with inflation.

If you were planning to stay in your home and had a suitable roof (unshaded, at a pitch of about 40 degrees, and facing between south-east and south-west), the main question was how big a system to install – assuming you could raise the installation costs. The bigger the system, the greater the financial return.

However, you shouldn’t worry if you put off doing anything because it has emerged this week that waiting has worked in your favour.

Solar experts say that as a result of the installation costs coming down, the investment value of the scheme has become even better. These lower installation costs, an inflation-linked increase to the feed-in tariff payments and the prospect of rising electricity prices all mean the guaranteed returns are now above 10% a year, depending on how you calculate it. And if you install before next April – when new payment tariffs look set to come into force – you are guaranteed the tariffs for the next 25 years at the old rate.

Gabriel Wondrausch, who set up Exeter-based PV installer Sun Gift Solar, says the cost of systems has come down dramatically in 18 months. “We’ve been supplying PV systems for almost five years now and the prices have been on an almost continuous downward path,” he says. “A year ago we were selling a large 4kWp system for around £16,000. Today that same one is costing less than £13,000.” (Two years ago the cost would have been closer to £20,000.)

Wondrausch says the volume of sales has been a major factor in UK prices coming down, as has the reduction of feed-in tariffs in Germany, Europe’s biggest PV market. The panel manufacturers, it seems, price their panels according to the returns consumers can expect, and have been lowering prices as a result.

Solarcentury, one of the UK’s biggest solar companies, confirms the view that prices are falling. And even British Gas has reduced the price of its PV systems. A spokesman says business efficiencies and efficiencies in the supply chain mean costs have fallen by about 20% since June last year. “A typical 2.5kWp system cost around £13,383 last year,” he says. “Today it would cost around £10,450. We also need to consider that panel efficiency has increased – panels are 10% more efficient than they were.”

Wondrausch points out that the generous tariffs won’t be around for ever. In September the government is expected to unveil a new – significantly less generous – scheme for those installing PV systems after April 2012, suggesting that if you want to do it, now is the time to act.

Originally, it was thought the payments for new installations would be cut by 9% from their current level of 43.3p per kWh generated.

Solarcentury says the industry is currently awaiting publication of the government’s proposals for tariff cuts. “There is no doubt that the proposed cut for new installations from April 2012 will be higher than the planned 9%,” it predicts.

Meanwhile, if you are thinking of installing a system be prepared to spend some time researching the company you are using to carry out the work.

Cathy Debenham, who runs website YouGen.co.uk, says there is growing evidence of dubious sales tactics in the solar PV market. She recently came across one company that claimed you could make money by installing a panel on a north-facing roof, which is nonsense. The consumer group Which? warned that some claims made by firms selling solar PV could not be substantiated. Its advice is that consumers should be wary of any company that offers a quote without visiting the home to carry out a proper survey, or one that makes grandiose claims about the income you will receive.

Debenham’s site is a good starting point if you’re looking for information, or for a good installer who comes with recommendations from other users. The Energy Saving Trust site has lots of information too.

One thing to ask your chosen installer is which panels they plan to use. Wondrausch, who was one of the first to install PV panels in the UK five years ago, says the panels vary significantly in the electricity they produce – by as much as 12.5%.


guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2011 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds

A three-bed eco-home in two days

Tuesday, June 28th, 2011

Who needs the hassle of building a Grand Designs-type eco-home when you can buy a kit to construct your own in days

In pictures: Building an off-site eco-home

Walking down a busy street in one of the smarter bits of London I spot the crane – a 35-tonne monster taking up half the road, its arm extending into the sky with what appears to be half a house dangling from it. As I get closer I hear 22-year-old Kirstie Finlayson shout “that’s my dad’s bedroom” as she points at a wall panel spinning 20ft up in the air. If I squint I can see a window and tiny spaces in it for a plug socket and light switch.

Tucker Finlayson, Kirstie’s father, is having a three-bedroom, split-level, eco-friendly home built in just two days in a tiny space just off a busy main road in West Hampstead. It has required 12 years of planning, trips to Germany, and a long and gruelling battle with the council to obtain planning permission, but construction is finally underway.

Tucker, a bass guitarist who has played double bass for decades with trad-jazz legend Acker Bilk, had owned a town house on Mill Lane since the mid-1960s but sold it to finance the new-build, cannily keeping hold of the garden. “One night I got drunk with a mate of mine who’s an architect, and he suggested I build a house at the end of the garden. It’s amazing what one drunken night can lead to,” he adds, pointing at the crane, lorry and house being built in front of us.

Finlayson first applied for planning permission in November 1999 and was finally granted it in December 2009. “It became a little game with the council. It was fun. I had to eliminate everything they objected to, one by one, until there was nothing left for them to object to.”

He opted for an eco-home, not only because he cares about the environment but because he is having it built for his daughter, making it a home for the future in many ways. It has been manufactured in Germany by Meisterstück Haus (MH), using pre-built panels that can be screwed and bolted together in just days, though the preparatory work before and finishing afterwards will add months to the timeframe.

“I wanted an eco-house without a Grand Designs budget,” Finlayson says – citing the popular TV show, where homes of the future are often built at vast expense, as his main inspiration. “I saw an energy-efficient home on the programme but it had cost the guy a fortune so I researched it and found MH, which could do a similar thing much cheaper.”

The segments of the home are manufactured at the MH factory in Hamlin, Germany, then transported to the construction site and assembled by a four-strong team of specialist German construction workers. Within three-five days the home is watertight, lockable and secure, with the roof on, all windows in and the entrance door fitted. It can take a further 12 weeks to finish off the interior fixtures and fittings including plumbing and electrics. Everything must satisfy all the usual UK building regulations.

Lesley Gross of MH says construction can often be quicker than the official estimate: “The construction in West Hampstead, for example, could have been done in a day if the crane and lorry had been able to arrive at 7am and stay until 8pm because it’s reasonably small – though the structure is far from simple.”

Tucker could only get permission for the crane to operate from 10am until 3pm because it required temporary traffic lights and plenty of ensuing disruption – not least to one woman who complains her car is being blocked. MH offers to pay for a taxi to take her anywhere she wants, all day, but she is adamant she wants to use her own car – which means the huge lorry on which Finlayson’s house is currently sitting has to be moved back and forth, wasting more time.

MH has built four homes in the UK to date and has two more in the pipeline this year. “Off-site construction – we prefer not to call it prefab – is becoming more and more popular,” Gross explains. “Sometimes clients simply want a house built quickly, but we want them to come to us because they want an eco-home. We believe in it and it works, delivering energy cost savings to clients.”

Brigid Sundaram lives in the first ever MH home to be built in the UK, in Abingdon near Oxford. “We’ve been in for about a year and we really love it,” she says. “We wanted an eco-build but couldn’t find a UK company that could guarantee air-tightness. MH said we could build a 180 square metre, four- to five-bedroom home in two days, which was true, and now we have all the eco technology you could wish for. I wanted to prove to my teenage children that you can have all the mod-cons and still be eco-friendly.” About 65% of her hot water is now heated using solar panels.

The house is built using sustainable materials, including kiln-dried and planed timber from a managed forest in Germany. It is well insulated, using Fermacell insulation made of recycled chips, cellulose and water, which is then baked and rolled, making it sand- and fire-proof. The house is screwed together to become air-tight, making it highly energy efficient – and cheap to heat.

MH clients must know what they want long before the panels arrive on-site. “The manufacturers produce everything to your specification, including where you want windows, light fittings, plugs and cables; so once they have been built it’s too late to tamper with the panels,” Sundaram explains. “If you subsequently decide you want to run a tiny cable somewhere, you shouldn’t, because the home might not be airtight anymore. For some people it’s no problem to plan ahead and visualise how their home will look, but others need a lot of help to ensure they get it right.”

Finlayson employed his friend to design the home and Sundaram to project manage it, flying to Germany himself to pick the finishings he wanted, including floor tiles, toilets and colour schemes. There has been much discussion with his daughter, as he is predominantly building the house for her.

“I wouldn’t be able to afford a home here on my own,” Kirstie says, “so I’m really lucky that dad has been able to buy somewhere that allows me to remain in the area. I was so young when it all started that I thought it would just be an upgrade to the wendy house I had in the back garden. I had picked out all the tiles I wanted, which were all purple and sparkly as I was only 11, so in some ways it’s lucky it took as long as it did.”

Finlayson paid around £100,000 to do the ground work, including foundations, architectural plans and other preparatory costs, £100,000 for the house itself, and £100,000 to finish everything off, including plumbing, electricity and furnishings. That’s £300,000 on a road where family homes sell for double or triple that, making the project financially as well as environmentally sound. “I just wanted to have fun,” Finlayson said, as a friend greets him with a cry of “ah, here’s the West Hampstead exhibitionist”.

The house is scheduled to be habitable by October, though Kirstie hopes it will be ready by the end of August, at which point she will move in with her father initially. “I’ll get some kittens and settle in,” she says. “I might move out one day, but I’ll never sell it. It’s too important. It’s dad’s legacy to me.”


guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2011 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds

Energy bill: landlords could be forced to refurbish energy-inefficient homes

Wednesday, June 15th, 2011

Proposed amendment would make landlords responsible for ‘greening’ properties or be prevented from renting them out

Landlords will be forced to refurbish hundreds of thousands of the UK’s most draughty and energy-inefficient homes or find themselves blocked from renting them out, under proposals unveiled on Tuesday.

The government has bowed to pressure from campaigners and brought forward an amendment to its energy bill, discussed by MPs yesterday, that would stop landlords from renting out homes that fell into the worst two bands of energy efficiency – F and G. The clause was missing from the original bill.

As a result, the estimated 680,000 rented homes falling into this category – about one-fifth of the total number of private rented residences – must be refurbished or taken off the market by 2018.

In addition, from 2016, private sector landlords will not be allowed to refuse “any reasonable request” to make energy efficiency improvements to their properties.

Landlords will be able to finance such improvements through loans taken out under the government’s “green deal” scheme, under which the cost of the loans will be paid for in installments on the energy bills at the property. The costs should be outweighed by the savings as less energy is used. “This means tenants will get a warmer home and cheaper bills, and the landlord gets the work done,” said a spokeswoman for the Department of Energy and Climate Change.

However, campaigners said the government was moving far too slowly. Landlords will be able to continue renting out such homes for six years, which they said was too lenient, as the green deal will come into force next year. Dave Timms, campaigner at Friends of the Earth, pointed to research from the Chartered Institute for Environmental Health that found ill-health caused by people living in such sub-standard accommodation was costing the NHS about £145m a year.

The groups also criticised the government for not strengthening tenants’ rights to request energy efficiency improvements. “There is nothing in the bill to protect people from retaliatory eviction – where landlords force the tenants to leave if they ask for improvements,” said Timms.

About one-fifth of the people in the UK living in “fuel poverty” – without enough money to heat their houses – are living in private rented accommodation.


guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2011 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds