Archive for the ‘Housing benefit’ Category

Diary of a tenant: No money, no food and no phone credit

Monday, July 18th, 2011

A jobcentre worker hit the wrong button, bank charges sent me over my overdraft limit and more trouble from the landlord

Part three Diary of a tenant: enter the landlord

A red-letter day looms. Finally I am due to be paid some jobseeker’s allowance, and so I set off to buy some food (the cupboards are actually bare). First I check my balance. Some money was credited, but more was taken out. It’s bank charges.

I then realise that what has been credited is not jobseeker’s allowance but a portion of housing benefit – or local housing allowance, as it is now known, and the reason defies belief. Frantic phone calls ascertain that “Somebody forgot to press a key,” when I signed on, and so my payment did not go through. At the jobcentre, stoic staff do what they can. I mention the bank charges, and one adviser suggests moving my account and complaining. Inwardly, I consider offering staff lessons on pressing the right button, but hold my silence.

The surrealism continues. Another letter, this time from the housing benefit office arrives, stating that they have stopped my claim after one week without explaining why.

I visit the office, and queue. Nonchalantly, the desk attendant produces a handwritten letter, which arrived a while ago. It is from “Bill”, my landlord, who makes inflated claims about the rent he insists I owe. He says it’s 12 weeks. I say it’s seven.

At the end of my tether, I patiently point out that the dates in the letter are not covered by my claim, and that I was not even eligible to claim at that time because I was a student. They agree it’s not their concern. Nevertheless they are “investigating”, and have put my claim on hold.

Why has Bill assumed I was signing on for all that time? If a tenant is more than eight weeks in arrears with rent, then benefits are stopped. I am not in that position, but in this topsy-turvy world, if they don’t pay me, I soon will be.

Next I visit the bank, to inquire about the charges (I’ve been waiting to be paid for some work for ages, and couldn’t cancel a direct debit in time). They are rude, and when I ask politely for a refund, they restate that I was given notice of the charges. They have charged me for going overdrawn when the overdraft was caused by their own charges.

Eventually the counter clerk repeats: “That’s all I have to say. That’s us done now.” .

I have no money, no food and no phone credit. Fortunately, a friend calls later and learning of my plight buys me pizza.

One week later my missing jobseeker’s allowance is paid, but I don’t know what to do about Bill’s housing benefit letter. Another notice of inspection arrives: he’s due next week, and I decide, reluctantly, to tackle him in person.

Meanwhile, I calculate exactly what I can afford to buy in the way of food. I make excuses to avoid meeting people for coffee or drinks. Walking between the various offices, I realise that the heavy rain is now flooding into my last pair of weather-proof shoes.


guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2011 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds

Shelter says cuts push vulnerable into hands of rogue landlords

Wednesday, March 30th, 2011

Shelter wants government action to regulate private rental sector and for local authorities to run accreditation schemes

Housing benefit cuts and the government’s refusal to regulate the private rented sector will force the most vulnerable citizens to depend on property managed by rogue landlords, Shelter has warned.

The charity has seen a 23% increase in complaints about landlords in the past year, with grievances over “shocking” levels of dampness and disrepair soaring by 40% and complaints about landlord harassment rising by nearly a quarter. At the same time, a chronic shortage of social housing and large numbers of people being priced out of the housing market have led to a 40% rise – to 3.4m – in the number of households in private rental property over the last five years.

Last year the housing minister, Grant Shapps, rejected new regulations and a national register of landlords proposed by Labour on the grounds it would introduce too much “burdensome red tape and bureaucracy”. Instead, he expects councils to tackle rogue landlords.

But Shelter warned that impending cuts to the local housing allowance and growing demand for rental property mean the poorest tenants could be pushed into the arms of the worst landlords.

Campbell Robb, chief executive of Shelter, said: “The housing minister’s claim that ‘the vast majority of England’s 3 million private tenants are happy with the service they receive’ has been seriously thrown into question. Our figures clearly show a worrying increase in the number of people seeking our help regarding problems with their landlord.

It’s frightening to see that complaints about bad landlords are increasing at such a rate at the very time that renting a home is fast becoming the only option for thousands of families across this country. It appears that rogue landlords are cashing in on this growing market.”

Daniel, a 33-year-old teacher of English to foreign students, thought he had found a bargain when he managed to rent a one-bedroom flat in Herne Hill, south London, for £700 a month. But he soon learned why the rent was so low: the flat was one of seven crammed into a terraced house that had previously had four bedrooms. Even the garage at the back had been converted into a flat.

He said: “The agent should have warned me about the number of tenants in the property. The neighbours were fine – there were just too many of them: whole families squashed into one-bedroom flats. The landlord was extremely elusive, and I had to move out for two weeks after a leakage problem caused my ceiling to cave in over Christmas and I couldn’t get hold of him.” But you would ask permission or at least warn tenants if you were going to do that, wouldn’t you?”

Shelter wants Shapps to produce a clear plan to tackle rogue landlords and ensure all local authorities sign up to a minimum standard accreditation scheme.

The Electrical Safety Council (ESC) is also calling for regulation to force landlords to improve electrical safety in rented homes. It says that while landlords are legally obliged to provide an annual gas safety certificate, there is no equivalent legal obligation for electrical installations.

The move is being supported by the family of Thirza Whittall, thea mother of two young children, who died when an electrical fault in her rental home caused the taps on the bath to become live. The electrical wiring in the property hadn’t not been tested since 1981. and tThe ESC says that if an electrical report – known as a Periodic Inspection Report – had been carried out, the faults leading to the tragedycould have been rectified and her death prevented.

Her mother, Jane Andain, said: “Thirza had just moved down from Birmingham to Cornwall, which she loved, and had found work as an orthoptist in the local hospital. Everything seemed to be going perfectly. But the property she’d rented had no earthing in its wiring, and a faulty heater earthed itself through the taps on the bath instead. When Thirza ran a bath and got into it, she was electrocuted.”

The ESC recommends rental homes should have a periodic inspection report carried out by a registered electrician at least every five years, or on change of tenancy. It has produced a leaflet – the Tenant’s Checklist – to provide tenants with essential information to help protect themselves and their families by following a few simple steps.

Shapps said: “The private rented sector performs an important role in providing housing for those who cannot access other forms. … “Accreditation schemes can be an effective way for consumers to identify good landlords in their area, and across the country there are many successful examples. However, the need for a scheme depends on local markets and it is much more appropriate for local authorities to make a decision on setting up a scheme than for government to impose one centrally.”


guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2011 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds